This article is not written to attack Muslims. They are loved by GOD and just as valuable in His eyes as Christians. They deserve respect, truth and love, not mockery or degrading comments.
For that reason, we must be able to honestly examine the differences between the religions and understand the decisive points where they diverge.
The central question I will address in this article is whether Christianity and Islam truly describe the same God, or if they represent two completely different belief systems with significant contradictions.
When we examine history, the scriptures, and the core teachings of both religions, we see something that is hard to simply ignore. Christianity and Islam cannot both describe God’s word, because there are crucial differences that separate the two belief systems. The issue is not merely different traditions or cultural expressions but claims that place the religions in complete opposition to each other.
The differences include:
- The nature of God
- The identity of Jesus
- The path to salvation
- Sin and forgiveness
- The crucifixion
- The way to eternal life
What follows is a clear, factual, and respectful comparison of some of the most fundamental differences. My purpose is not to win a debate or belittle Islam, but to show why Jesus is more than “just” a prophet and why the Gospels in the Bible are completely unique.
Jesus’ identity is the greatest dividing line
The greatest and most decisive difference between Christianity and Islam concerns who Jesus was.
Christianity’s view of Jesus
In the Christian faith, Jesus stands at the center from the creation narrative and throughout the Old Testament, which tells the story leading up to the coming Messiah who would save the world from sin. The New Testament then describes His life, the growth of the church, and the final judgment.
The Bible presents Jesus as the Son of God in human form, the promised Messiah, the Savior of the world, and the only way to the Father.
Without Jesus there is no salvation, no forgiveness of sin and no hope. The entire Christian faith stands or falls on His identity and on His death for humanity so that we could be reconciled with God after the fall in the Garden of Eden.
Islam’s view of Jesus
In Islam, Jesus (Isa) is an honored prophet, but not the Son of God. This means that Islam denies the most central truth of Christianity. In Islam it is Muhammad who is the final and highest prophet, and Jesus has a lower, though important, status.
These two views are incompatible.
If Jesus truly is who the Bible says He is, then these differences are not merely theological, they determine your salvation and your relationship with God.
The crucifixion is the center of salvation
For Christians, Jesus’ death on the cross and His resurrection are the heart of the gospel, something Islam completely denies.
Christianity’s view of the cross
In Christianity, the crucifixion is the decisive moment where God’s love and justice meet.
Jesus did not die merely as a martyr or moral example but as the ultimate sacrifice for humanity’s sin. God allowed Jesus, who lived without sin, to bear the punishment for our failures.
Because of the fall in Eden, humanity became separated from God and inherited a sinful nature.
Jesus carried our sin, bore our punishment, and took upon Himself the wrath we deserved.
Through His resurrection, death was defeated and salvation completed.
Without the cross there is no forgiveness, no reconciliation, and no path back to God.
Remove the cross and all of us, because of our sin, stand condemned to an eternity separated from God.
Islam’s view of the cross
In the Qur’an, the crucifixion is denied entirely, which means no one died for the sins of the world. According to Islamic belief, Jesus died like all prophets, but humanity only believed a crucifixion happened when it actually did not.
This belief directly undermines the entire message of the Bible and raises questions about God’s character: Would God really deceive the whole world about something so central?
If Jesus did not die on the cross, the Bible collapses.
If He did, the Islamic narrative cannot represent the same God as the Christian one.
There is no middle ground. If Jesus truly gave His life for the world, the crucifixion becomes a personal invitation for every human being to receive forgiveness of sin. Everyone must decide who Jesus is and what His sacrifice means.
God’s grace or your own righteousness
Another difference concerns salvation:
How do we receive eternal life?
Christianity’s view
In Christianity, salvation is a gift, not something you can earn. You cannot be saved by your own achievements or by being a “good” person. Everything rests on God’s grace and the sacrifice of His Son on the cross so that the world might receive forgiveness of sins.
“For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16)
Thus it is your faith and not your performance that determines your eternity.
No one is without sin, and therefore all stand separated from God. A central aspect of Christian faith is that when you receive Jesus as your Savior, you can be certain of your salvation. There is no uncertainty, God gives a promise you can stand upon.
“I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.”
(1 John 5:13)
Salvation is based on a relationship with God, not your own efforts.
Islam’s view
In Islam there is no such assurance.
Salvation depends entirely on your deeds and obedience to the law. Everything is weighed on a cosmic scale: your good deeds on one side, your bad on the other.
But even if your good deeds outweigh your bad ones, there is no guarantee you will enter paradise.
Allah may still choose to condemn a person to hell if he wills.
The only direct “guarantee” mentioned in the Qur’an is dying as a martyr in jihad.
Jihad means “struggle” or “striving,” and in Islam it is used in two main ways:
The inner struggle – the effort to fight one’s own sin, egoism, and temptations in order to live righteously. This is often called “the greater jihad” and refers to moral and spiritual discipline.
The outer struggle – a physical battle or armed conflict to defend Islam or the Muslim community. This is sometimes called “the lesser jihad.” In classical Islamic theology, this type of struggle, when carried out “in the way of God,” is believed to offer special religious merit.
Dying in jihad (the physical struggle) is considered the only guaranteed path to paradise. It is not a coincidence that some Muslims are willing to die or even kill for their faith, because teachings about jihad provide a strong incentive to do so.
This system leaves Muslims without certainty or hope; they are dependent on their own performance with no promise of forgiveness.
Two different pictures of God
Both religions affirm one God, but describe Him so differently that it cannot logically be the same being.
Christianity’s view of God
The Christian faith proclaims one God existing eternally in three persons: the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Not three gods, but one God in perfect unity and love.
- The Father is the source.
- The Son reveals God, takes our sin and rises again.
- The Holy Spirit lives in believers, transforms, guides and gives new life.
Without the Trinity, the gospel cannot hold together.
Islam’s view of God
Islam rejects the Trinity entirely and denies that God could have a Son.
Allah is described as absolute and solitary, not relational, not a Father, and not present in the personal way the Bible describes.
A significant difference appears in Qur’an 5:116, where the Qur’an claims Christians believe in three gods: God, Jesus and Mary, something Christianity has never taught.
Islam does not address the biblical Trinity; it addresses a different concept entirely.
Two images that cannot be reconciled
The Bible’s God is relational, loving, and truthful;
Allah in the Qur’an is solitary, unknowable in a personal sense, and described with characteristics the Bible never applies to God.
Thus the two cannot be the same.
Abraham: the same man, but two completely different stories
Christianity, Judaism and Islam all trace roots to Abraham, but they tell different stories with different heirs, different promises, and different purposes.
The biblical account
- The covenant is passed through Isaac.
- Israel carries God’s promise.
- The Messiah comes through Isaac’s lineage.
- Jerusalem is the center of God’s work.
- Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are the patriarchs of faith.
- Jesus affirms this lineage repeatedly.
The Islamic account
- The covenant is moved from Isaac to Ishmael.
- Mecca becomes the spiritual center instead of Jerusalem.
- Ishmael becomes the ancestor of the Arab peoples.
- Muhammad comes from Ishmael’s lineage.
But the Bible never presents Ishmael as the covenant bearer.
The Bible cannot be misunderstood
- God promises a son through Sarah (Genesis 17:15–19).
- “I will establish my covenant with Isaac” (17:21).
Ishmael is blessed, but he does not carry the covenant.
Historical and archaeological evidence
✔ There are no historical sources linking Ishmael to Arabia.
✔ The Islamic version appears over 2,600 years after Abraham.
✔ The biblical version aligns with archaeology and ancient texts.
When Jesus speaks of Abraham, it is always through the line:
Abraham → Isaac → Jacob → Israel
Never through Ishmael.
The covenant with Israel
In the Bible, God’s covenant with Israel is eternal.
- Israel is the land God promised to Abraham’s descendants.
- The Jewish people are preserved through history.
- The Messiah comes through Abraham → Isaac → Jacob → Israel.
- The restoration of Israel was foretold by the prophets and partially fulfilled in 1948.
Throughout the Bible, the message is consistent:
God’s covenant with Israel does not end and will never end. Some Christians claim the church has replaced Israel (replacement theology), but this idea has no biblical support. The church opens the way for all nations to know God through Jesus, but it does not nullify God’s promises to Israel.
Islam: the covenant is transferred
Islam claims:
- Israel is no longer God’s chosen people
- Jews corrupted their scriptures
- The covenant was transferred to Ishmael and his descendants
- Mecca replaces Jerusalem
This version is not supported by archaeology or Old Testament prophecy.
Biblical prophecy describes Israel’s dispersion and later return to its land and fulfilled with astonishing accuracy. No other nation disappeared for 2,000 years and then re-emerged, as Israel did in 1948.
Jesus affirms Israel’s chosen status
Jesus bases His entire teaching on the Old Testament. He constantly refers to the patriarchs, the prophets and God’s promises to Israel as historical and spiritual truth.
Revelation: Jesus and Muhammad differ in every crucial way
Christianity: public revelation
- Jesus performed miracles publicly.
- He taught openly to crowds.
- Over 500 witnessed His resurrection.
- The Bible is written by multiple independent authors.
- Archaeology confirms its accuracy, including the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Islam: private revelation
- Muhammad received revelations alone in a cave.
- No other person saw or heard them.
- There are no contemporary witnesses to Muhammad.
- The Qur’an was compiled long after his death.
- Muhammad performed no publicly verified miracles.
Islam rests on one man’s private experience. Early Islamic sources even state Muhammad feared something evil had happened when he received his first revelation and needed reassurance from Khadija.
A biblical warning
Christians are commanded to test every spiritual experience.
Paul writes:
“Satan himself disguises himself as an angel of light.”
(2 Corinthians 11:14)
And:
“Even if an angel from heaven preaches a different gospel, let him be cursed.”
(Galatians 1:8)
Summary
- Christianity is based on thousands of eyewitnesses, public miracles, and fulfilled prophecy.
- Islam is based on one man’s solitary experience that cannot be externally verified.
- The messages contradict each other in the identity of God, salvation, the nature of Jesus, the crucifixion, and the covenant with Israel.
Therefore, Christianity and Islam cannot be two versions of the same revelation.
Their messages are fundamentally different and must be evaluated accordingly.
Bibliska nyheter 